It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
You will learn that the ruling made by the High Court was stuck to. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.